hi Raghu,
Thanks for sharing the Code and video, i did used the code to create the java mapping , but i didn't see any transformation with the code.
May be i did something wrong , please correct me,
My scenario again,
I have message mapping , in one of source field it should be mapped with Target field and get the output with CDATA Tag
Source Filed : <Text><PI is Awesome><Text> ------> Target Field <TextC><![CDATA[PI is Awesome]]></TextC> , so to get this result i wrote simple UDF to get
<[!CDATA]]> tag in target field , but after mapping is executed the output for target field is
<Text> ------> Target Field <TextC><<![CDATA[PI is Awesome]]></TextC> ............so to replace the ⁢ and > with < and >
and as you suggested i used the Java mapping in Operation mapping along with Message mapping. But i didn't see any change. any more suggestion
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Pooja